OSI-licensed only · self-hostable

Open-Source WordPress Alternatives (2026)

WordPress is itself open source, released under the GPL (version 2 or later), so this page isn't about escaping a closed product. People look for other open-source CMSs when they want a simpler publishing tool, a flat-file site with no database, a developer-first headless CMS, or a different security and architecture model.

Every tool below is under an OSI-approved licence (MIT, GPL-2.0, GPL-2.0-or-later or BSD-3-Clause), checked against its repository. Directus, a popular headless CMS that is sometimes called open source, is listed separately because its licence is source-available.

Licences checked against each repository on November 7, 2026.

What you're replacing

  • •A blog or marketing site with an editor-friendly admin
  • •Themes and plugins for design and features
  • •Memberships, newsletters and subscriptions
  • •Structured content served to a custom front end

At a glance

ToolBest forLicenceRuns as
GhostPublishing, memberships and newslettersMITServer
DrupalLarge, structured, multi-editor sitesGPL-2.0Server
JoomlaAll-round CMS with built-in multilingual supportGPL-2.0-or-laterServer
GravFast flat-file sites with no databaseMITServer
StrapiHeadless CMS with auto-generated APIsMITServer
PayloadCode-first CMS inside a Next.js appMITServer
WagtailDjango teams building editor-friendly sitesBSD-3-ClauseServer

1. Ghost

MIT

Best for: Publishing, memberships and newsletters

Independent technology for modern publishing, memberships, subscriptions and newsletters. A Node.js CMS with a Content API and theme development, installed on your own server with the Ghost CLI.

Strengths

  • + Memberships and newsletters built in
  • + Content API and theme system
  • + Ghost CLI handles install and SSL

Trade-offs

  • − Narrower focus than WordPress
  • − Smaller plugin ecosystem

2. Drupal

GPL-2.0

Best for: Large, structured, multi-editor sites

An open source content management platform for everything from personal blogs to large community sites. Over a thousand free modules on Drupal.org extend core, and security advisories are published there. The GitHub repository is a verbatim mirror of Drupal.org's code.

Strengths

  • + Large module ecosystem
  • + Public security advisories and change records
  • + Suited to complex sites

Trade-offs

  • − Steeper learning curve than WordPress
  • − GitHub repository is a mirror; development happens on Drupal.org

3. Joomla

GPL-2.0-or-later

Best for: All-round CMS with built-in multilingual support

A free and open-source content management system for building websites and online applications. Runs on PHP with MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL, and is distributed under the GNU General Public License version 2 or later.

Strengths

  • + Multilingual website support
  • + Stable packages from downloads.joomla.org
  • + PHP with MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL

Trade-offs

  • − Smaller extension ecosystem than WordPress
  • − Admin concepts differ from WordPress

4. Grav

MIT

Best for: Fast flat-file sites with no database

A fast, simple and flexible file-based web platform. Content is Markdown, templates use Twig and configuration is YAML, and the GPM package manager installs plugins, themes and updates. Requires PHP 8.3 or higher.

Strengths

  • + No database to manage
  • + Markdown content and Twig templates
  • + Built-in package manager

Trade-offs

  • − Less friendly for non-technical editors
  • − Fewer ready-made themes than WordPress

5. Strapi

MIT

Best for: Headless CMS with auto-generated APIs

The leading open-source headless CMS, written in JavaScript and TypeScript. Includes a Content-Type Builder, auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs, roles and permissions, a media library and i18n. Part of the repository (the ee/ directory) is under a separate Enterprise licence.

Strengths

  • + REST and GraphQL APIs generated automatically
  • + Roles, permissions and media library built in
  • + Works with SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL and MariaDB

Trade-offs

  • − Headless: you build the front end yourself
  • − Enterprise features live in a separately licensed ee/ folder

6. Payload

MIT

Best for: Code-first CMS inside a Next.js app

The open-source, fullstack Next.js framework, usable as a headless CMS or a backend with an admin panel. Includes authentication, versions and drafts, localisation, a block-based layout builder and granular access control.

Strengths

  • + Authentication and access control included
  • + Versions, drafts and localisation
  • + TypeScript types generated automatically

Trade-offs

  • − Aimed at developers, not non-technical site owners
  • − Tied to the Next.js ecosystem

7. Wagtail

BSD-3-Clause

Best for: Django teams building editor-friendly sites

An open source content management system built on Django with a fast, attractive interface for authors. Offers StreamField for flexible content, a Content API for headless use, multi-site and multi-language support, and built-in search.

Strengths

  • + Author-friendly interface
  • + StreamField for structured flexible content
  • + Multi-site and multi-language support

Trade-offs

  • − Requires Python and Django skills
  • − Smaller plugin and theme market

New open-source tools, weekly

One email a week with the open-source projects, launches and releases added to TechLogHub. Unsubscribe in one click.

Get the TechLogHub digest

One email a week: new and trending developer tools, fresh comparisons, and what shipped. Unsubscribe in one click.

How to choose

If you need…Start with
A clean publishing platform with newsletters and paid membersGhost
A large, complex site with many content types and editorsDrupal
A familiar all-round CMS with multilingual supportJoomla
A small site with no databaseGrav
A headless CMS feeding a custom front endStrapi or Payload
A Python/Django stack with a polished editorWagtail

Often called open source, but aren't

Public source code, but under licences the Open Source Initiative doesn't approve. Fine to use; read the terms first.

  • Directus (Monospace Sustainable Core License (MSCL) 1.0)

    The README describes MSCL as a source-available licence derived from the Fair Core License. It is free for organisations under a revenue and headcount threshold, but it is not OSI-approved.

Open-source WordPress alternatives: FAQ

Quick answers to common questions

Is WordPress open source?

Yes. WordPress is released under the GPL (GNU General Public License) version 2 or, at your option, any later version. The alternatives here suit different needs rather than replacing a closed product.

What is the best open-source alternative to WordPress?

It depends on the job. Ghost suits publishing and newsletters, Drupal and Joomla are full CMS platforms, Grav is a flat-file option, and Strapi, Payload and Wagtail are developer-oriented.

Which WordPress alternative has no database?

Grav is a file-based platform that stores content as Markdown with YAML configuration, so it doesn't need a database to run.

Is Strapi fully open source?

The Community Edition is MIT-licensed. Strapi's LICENSE file says the ee/ directory is covered by a separate Enterprise Edition licence, so features there are not under the MIT licence.

Is Directus open source?

Not by the OSI definition. Its README says it is licensed under the Monospace Sustainable Core License 1.0, a source-available licence derived from the Fair Core License.

Maintain an open-source WordPress alternative?

List it on TechLogHub and we'll review it for this page.

Submit a project