OSI-licensed only · self-hostable

Open-Source Dropbox Alternatives (2026)

Dropbox does three jobs for most people: it keeps folders in sync across devices, lets you share files and folders by link, and gives teams a shared place for documents. Open-source tools cover each of these, and running them yourself means your files sit on a server you control instead of a vendor's cloud.

Every tool below is under an OSI-approved licence (AGPL-3.0, GPL-2.0, MPL-2.0, Apache-2.0), checked against its repository. Some are full Dropbox-style platforms, while Syncthing only syncs between your own devices, so the list says which is which.

Licences checked against each repository on November 7, 2026.

What you're replacing

  • •Folder sync across laptop, desktop and phone
  • •Sharing files and folders by link, with passwords
  • •Team folders with permissions and version history
  • •Web access to files from any browser

At a glance

ToolBest forLicenceRuns as
NextcloudFull Dropbox replacement with appsAGPL-3.0Server
SeafileFast sync with library encryptionGPL-2.0Server
SyncthingPrivate device-to-device syncMPL-2.0Desktop app
ownCloud Infinite Scale (oCIS)Modern ownCloud, single binaryApache-2.0Server
OpenCloudSovereign file sharing for organisationsApache-2.0Server
Pydio CellsOrganisation-wide file sharingAGPL-3.0Server
FileBrowser QuantumSimple web file manager for existing foldersApache-2.0Docker

1. Nextcloud

AGPL-3.0

Best for: Full Dropbox replacement with apps

Describes itself as a safe home for all your data: a self-hosted server for storing, syncing and sharing files, contacts and calendars. The repository's licence is AGPL-3.0.

Strengths

  • + File sync and sharing in one self-hosted server
  • + Also handles contacts and calendars
  • + Active repository with a long commit history

Trade-offs

  • − More moving parts to run than a pure sync tool
  • − Mixed scope can feel heavy if you only need file sync

2. Seafile

GPL-2.0

Best for: Fast sync with library encryption

Open-source cloud storage whose README lists selective folder sync, resumable transfers, shared folders and password-protected links, version control, and client-side library encryption. Component licences differ: GPLv2 for the desktop client, AGPLv3 for the server core, Apache-2.0 for Seahub.

Strengths

  • + Selective sync and drive client with on-demand files
  • + Library encryption with your own password
  • + Integrates with OnlyOffice and Collabora

Trade-offs

  • − Licences differ across components
  • − Fewer bundled apps than Nextcloud

3. Syncthing

MPL-2.0

Best for: Private device-to-device sync

Open-source continuous file synchronisation between two or more computers. It has no central server to run, which makes it a sync tool rather than a sharing platform.

Strengths

  • + No server to maintain
  • + Straightforward continuous sync
  • + MPL-2.0 licence

Trade-offs

  • − No link sharing or web file browser
  • − Not designed as a team collaboration platform

4. ownCloud Infinite Scale (oCIS)

Apache-2.0

Best for: Modern ownCloud, single binary

Described as the new file sync and share platform from ownCloud, positioned as a self-contained server that works without an external database or identity provider.

Strengths

  • + Self-contained, no external database needed
  • + Apache-2.0 licence
  • + Built on reva

Trade-offs

  • − Newer architecture than classic ownCloud
  • − Smaller app ecosystem than Nextcloud

5. OpenCloud

Apache-2.0

Best for: Sovereign file sharing for organisations

Describes itself as the open-source platform for file management, sharing and collaboration, with a Go backend. The repository is licensed Apache-2.0.

Strengths

  • + Permissive Apache-2.0 licence
  • + Focused on file management and sharing
  • + Written in Go

Trade-offs

  • − Young project compared with Nextcloud
  • − Fewer integrations out of the box

6. Pydio Cells

AGPL-3.0

Best for: Organisation-wide file sharing

Described as the next-generation file sharing platform for organisations, a full Go rewrite of Pydio using a micro-service architecture.

Strengths

  • + Built for organisation-level sharing
  • + Go micro-service architecture
  • + AGPL-3.0 licence

Trade-offs

  • − Micro-service design is heavier to operate
  • − README warns the v5 branch is work in progress

7. FileBrowser Quantum

Apache-2.0

Best for: Simple web file manager for existing folders

A self-hosted web file manager with user management, sharing and file preview and editing, and a fork of the original File Browser project.

Strengths

  • + Lightweight way to browse and share a folder
  • + Responsive interface
  • + Apache-2.0 licence

Trade-offs

  • − A file manager, not a sync platform
  • − No desktop sync client mentioned

New open-source tools, weekly

One email a week with the open-source projects, launches and releases added to TechLogHub. Unsubscribe in one click.

Get the TechLogHub digest

One email a week: new and trending developer tools, fresh comparisons, and what shipped. Unsubscribe in one click.

How to choose

If you need…Start with
Replace Dropbox for a team, with calendars and contacts tooNextcloud
Fast sync with end-to-end library encryptionSeafile
Just keep my own devices in sync, no serverSyncthing
Apache-2.0 licensed server platformOpenCloud or ownCloud oCIS
Share files from folders already on a serverFileBrowser Quantum or Pydio Cells

Open-source Dropbox alternatives: FAQ

Quick answers to common questions

Is there an open-source version of Dropbox?

Dropbox itself is proprietary. Nextcloud and Seafile are the closest open-source equivalents for sync, sharing and team folders, and Syncthing covers pure device-to-device sync.

Which Dropbox alternative needs no server?

Syncthing. It synchronises files between your own computers continuously and has no central server to run, but it does not provide link sharing.

Is Seafile fully open source?

The repository README lists different licences by component: GPLv2 for the desktop sync client, AGPLv3 for the server core, GPLv3 for the Android app and Apache-2.0 for Seahub and the iOS app.

Are ownCloud Infinite Scale and OpenCloud the same project?

They are separate repositories, both licensed Apache-2.0. oCIS is ownCloud's platform and OpenCloud presents itself as its own open-source file platform, so evaluate each on its own.

Can I use these with my existing Office documents?

Some can. Seafile's README lists OnlyOffice and Collabora integrations. Check each project's documentation for the editor it supports before choosing.

Maintain an open-source Dropbox alternative?

List it on TechLogHub and we'll review it for this page.

Submit a project