OSI-licensed only · self-hostable

Open-Source CKEditor Alternatives (2026)

CKEditor 5 is a JavaScript rich-text editor that is open source under GPL-2.0-or-later, with commercial terms available from its vendor. Teams look elsewhere when GPL does not fit their product, or when they want a more headless, framework-first editor.

Every tool below is under an OSI-approved licence (MIT, BSD-3-Clause, MPL-2.0, GPL-2.0+ or Apache-2.0), checked against its repository. Several have paid add-ons or separately licensed packages, noted in each entry. ProseMirror is left out because its repository was archived and has moved elsewhere.

Licences checked against each repository on November 7, 2026.

What you're replacing

  • •WYSIWYG editing in a web application
  • •Collaborative editing and comments
  • •Custom nodes, plugins and toolbars
  • •Markdown or block-based content models

At a glance

ToolBest forLicenceRuns as
TiptapHeadless editor you design yourselfMITServer
LexicalReliable, accessible editor frameworkMITServer
QuillStraightforward editor with a ready UIBSD-3-ClauseServer
SlateFully custom editors in ReactMITServer
MilkdownMarkdown-first WYSIWYGMITServer
BlockNoteNotion-style block editor for ReactMPL-2.0Server
TinyMCETraditional WYSIWYG with many pluginsGPL-2.0-or-laterServer
Editor.jsBlock editor with clean JSON outputApache-2.0Server

1. Tiptap

MIT

Best for: Headless editor you design yourself

A headless, framework-agnostic rich-text editor built on ProseMirror with 100+ extensions. Some Pro Extensions, such as collaboration and AI features, need a paid subscription.

Strengths

  • + No built-in UI, full design control
  • + Large extension set
  • + MIT core

Trade-offs

  • − Pro features are paid
  • − You build the toolbar and UI

2. Lexical

MIT

Best for: Reliable, accessible editor framework

An extensible text editor framework from Meta focused on reliability, accessibility and performance.

Strengths

  • + Accessibility and performance focus
  • + Extensible
  • + MIT licence

Trade-offs

  • − Framework, not a ready UI
  • − Fewer out-of-box features than CKEditor

3. Quill

BSD-3-Clause

Best for: Straightforward editor with a ready UI

A modern rich-text editor built for compatibility and extensibility, maintained by Slab.

Strengths

  • + Quick to set up
  • + Mature project
  • + BSD-3-Clause

Trade-offs

  • − Less suited to complex documents
  • − Collaboration needs extra work

4. Slate

MIT

Best for: Fully custom editors in React

A completely customisable framework for building rich-text editors. The README notes it is still in beta.

Strengths

  • + Highly customisable
  • + Plain JSON-like data model
  • + MIT licence

Trade-offs

  • − Beta status
  • − Needs significant development effort

5. Milkdown

MIT

Best for: Markdown-first WYSIWYG

A plugin-driven WYSIWYG Markdown editor framework inspired by Typora and built on ProseMirror and remark.

Strengths

  • + Markdown-native
  • + Plugin-driven
  • + MIT licence

Trade-offs

  • − Narrower than a general rich-text editor
  • − Smaller ecosystem

6. BlockNote

MPL-2.0

Best for: Notion-style block editor for React

A block-based React rich-text editor built on ProseMirror and Tiptap. Most packages are MPL-2.0, but the xl-* packages are GPL-3.0 or need a commercial licence.

Strengths

  • + Notion-style blocks out of the box
  • + Built on Tiptap
  • + MPL-2.0 core

Trade-offs

  • − xl packages are GPL-3.0 or commercial
  • − React-focused

7. TinyMCE

GPL-2.0-or-later

Best for: Traditional WYSIWYG with many plugins

An open-source rich-text editor for web apps with classic, inline and distraction-free modes and 50+ plugins, licensed under GPL-2.0 or later.

Strengths

  • + Familiar classic editor feel
  • + Integrations for React, Vue and Angular
  • + Many plugins

Trade-offs

  • − Same GPL consideration as CKEditor
  • − Vendor sells paid tiers

8. Editor.js

Apache-2.0

Best for: Block editor with clean JSON output

A block-style editor where each block type comes from a plugin, and the output is clean JSON rather than HTML.

Strengths

  • + JSON output
  • + Plugin-per-block design
  • + Apache-2.0

Trade-offs

  • − Not a traditional WYSIWYG
  • − Render the JSON yourself

New open-source tools, weekly

One email a week with the open-source projects, launches and releases added to TechLogHub. Unsubscribe in one click.

Get the TechLogHub digest

One email a week: new and trending developer tools, fresh comparisons, and what shipped. Unsubscribe in one click.

How to choose

If you need…Start with
Closest classic WYSIWYG, different vendorTinyMCE
Headless editor with your own UITiptap or Lexical
Notion-style blocks in ReactBlockNote
Markdown editingMilkdown
Content stored as JSON blocksEditor.js
A simple, ready-made toolbarQuill

Open-source CKEditor alternatives: FAQ

Quick answers to common questions

Is CKEditor open source?

CKEditor 5 is open source under GPL-2.0-or-later, with commercial terms available from its vendor. Check that the GPL fits your product.

What is the best open-source alternative to CKEditor?

TinyMCE is the closest classic WYSIWYG; Tiptap and Lexical suit teams who want to design their own UI. The right pick depends on how much UI you want built in.

Which options avoid the GPL?

Tiptap, Lexical, Slate and Milkdown are MIT, Quill is BSD-3-Clause, Editor.js is Apache-2.0, and BlockNote's core is MPL-2.0.

Do these editors support real-time collaboration?

Some do, but often through paid or separate components. Tiptap's collaboration extensions are Pro, for instance, while it pairs with the open-source Hocuspocus backend.

Is TinyMCE open source?

The repository states GPL-2.0 or later. The vendor also sells paid plans and support.

Maintain an open-source CKEditor alternative?

List it on TechLogHub and we'll review it for this page.

Submit a project